|
What are your thoughts on de-publishing? My $.02: I think de-publishing is acceptable when it's done for liability purposes. It's also ok if you've flamed someone and want to make amends. This medium is fleeting - eventually all of it will be de-published. There's nothing wrong with keeping your site tidy. BUT... if you take a firm stand on some legal issue (say, a pending issue before the Supreme Court), and it turns out that you're on the losing end of the battle, you should not de-publish simply to save face. Journalists don't get to take back their articles. Stand behind your words! This is a suitable segue into the next lesson on "Choosing Your Words Carefully." Posted by Andrew Zangrilli at November 25, 2003 02:12 PM | TrackBack |
Actually, online journalists DO get to change their words and their minds.
Sometimes a well-intentioned posting or article can contain information that, upon further reflection and/or fact-checking, is simply inaccurate.
From a copyediting perspective, the ease of editing text in already-published content is one of the beauties of the electronic medium.
Posted by: andy on December 3, 2003 03:49 AM