Fair use trumps trademark, at least sometimes
     « Could law clerks spin MGM v. Grokster? | Main | With Geico on the Ropes, Google Takes a Poke at American Blind »

The Supreme Court issued a "near" unanimous decision (some of the justices dissented on a couple of footnotes) in a case questioning whether rival companies can use each others' trademarked terms.

The case is KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc., et al and it came up from the Ninth Circuit. In the case, the justices held that a company wishing to employ a fair use defense does not have to show a lack of confusion. Tough to prove a negative in any event. What this case means is that consumer confusion can be shown in a counter to a fair use defense, but the burden is now on the complainant to show confusion, even if the term is protected by trademark or other special registration.

Posted by dr. wex at December 9, 2004 11:18 AM